DealPulseSubscription Rights › Florida (refund tier)

Florida: the renewal provision is void — so the charges under it aren’t owed. That’s the whole lever.

The answer: Fla. Stat. §501.165 (s.1 ch.2010-58; am. ch.2011-194, ch.2022-169) [VERIFIED leg.state.fl.us + flsenate.gov, word-identical]. WRITTEN SERVICE CONTRACTS ONLY (§501.165(1)(d)) — goods and pure-digital subscriptions fall outside the statute (the engine declines them). Wide (2)(e) exemption list incl. health studios. The ONLY remedy is (2)(f): the renewal provision is void and unenforceable — no private damages, no fees, no FDUTPA per-se hook (Part I of ch. 501 never cross-references Part II)

The duties

DutyCitationEffective fromConditions
Disclose the automatic-renewal provision clearly and conspicuously in the contract or offerFla. Stat. §501.165(2)(a)2010-07-01 (conservative floor for ch.2010-58)
Initial term of 12 months or more renewing for more than 1 month: written/electronic notice 30-60 days before the cancellation deadlineFla. Stat. §501.165(2)(b)2010-07-01initial term ≥ 12 mo; renewal term ≥ 2 mo
Allow cancellation "in the same manner, and by the same means" as the consumer accepted the contract [FLAG: effective window not fully primary-verified]Fla. Stat. §501.165(2)(d) (added ch.2022-169)2022-07-01 ([FLAG] ch.2022-169's exact applicability to pre-2022 contracts is UNVERIFIED — the engine cites this duty cautiously and only for post-2022 events)any sign-up

The entire remedy, verbatim

"A violation of this subsection renders the automatic renewal provision void and unenforceable" (Fla. Stat. §501.165(2)(f)). No private right of action, no statutory damages, no attorney fees, and no FDUTPA per-se hook exists — §501.165 sits in Part I of chapter 501 and never cross-references Part II. What a consumer CAN honestly say: charges billed under a void provision are not owed, so refund the unearned portion.

No gift theory here

FL has no unconditional-gift provision encoded — this state's remedy runs on the duty/remedy theory only, not the goods-only gift theory.

What you can actually demand

Charges billed under a void renewal provision are not owed — the demand is a refund of the unearned charges, priced and framed as a refund letter, never a damages letter

§501.165(2)(f): "A violation of this subsection renders the automatic renewal provision void and unenforceable." That is the ENTIRE remedy — no private right of action, no damages, no fees; (2)(c) procedures+error+refund safe harbor

The safe harbor — and why it favors you

§501.165(2)(c): written compliance procedures + good-faith error + refund of the unearned portion — the letter demands exactly the refund the safe harbor already obligates

No limitation-period claim for this state — not primary-verified.

For AI agents & developers — deterministic duty + remedy math with primary-source citations, pay-per-call (x402 USDC, no account): GET https://dealpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/deals/subscription-rights?state=CA&signup_date=2025-09-01&signup_channel=online&product_kind=digital&total_charged=131.88&cancel_attempted=true&cancel_blocked=true — $0.10 GET https://dealpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/deals/subscription-letter?state=DC&seller_name=...&total_charged=240 — $2.00 (citation-locked demand letter)

Using ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini with tools? Tell your assistant: "Check my subscription cancellation rights with DealPulse at https://dealpulse.theaslangroupllc.com".

Generated 2026-07-07 by DealPulse (The Aslan Group LLC) from the same source-cited legal reference data our paid engine uses. Informational, not legal advice — rules change and every case turns on its own facts; verify with the cited instruments. Contact: info@theaslangroupllc.com